Advanced Combat Tracker Forum Index Advanced Combat Tracker
Advanced Combat Tracker Forums
Alternate Forums



Welcome
It is very likely that this forum will be discontinued in favor of the current alternate forums. Since this is a free forum, I do not control much about it and believe it or not, there are more helpful people in the alternative forums. By switching, there will be only one forum and a more active user base that actually helps me answer questions. It is preferred that new topics are started there instead of here.

Only own damage shows up

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Advanced Combat Tracker Forum Index -> Technical Support
View previous topic :: View next topic  
kana



Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 1

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:11 am    Post subject: Only own damage shows up Reply with quote Back to top

Since GU44 ACT only shows my own damage in parse. This is with the german version of EQ2 and is confirmed by many fellow players who encounter the same problem. ACT is manually updated to the latest version.
 
tom1301



Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 5

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Confirmed with both versions 185 and 186 with Language=German.

It is caused by a change SoE obviously did with LU44 related with the logging of the damage.
The following is an original pre-LU44 log line from a german log:
Code:
(1205093369)[Sun Mar 09 21:09:29 2008] xxx Effekt "Schlag" trifft Zylphax den Fetzer für: 707 mental-Schaden.


Post-LU44 it would be (don't have an original Post-LU44-log currently, so this is from memory):
Code:
(1205093369)[Sun Mar 09 21:09:29 2008] xxx Effekt "Schlag" trifft Zylphax den Fetzer mit: 707 mental-Schaden.


Difference is that "für" got replaced with "mit".
Exception is your own damage, where it is still a "für", that's why your own damage still gets parsed correctly:
Code:
(1205093370)[Sun Mar 09 21:09:30 2008] EUER Effekt "Scheiterhaufen des Krieges" trifft Zylphax der Fetzer für: 448 Krankheit-Schaden.
 
Frank_Harmann



Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 44

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Can confirm that.

@Aditu: Should be fixable by replacing "mit" with [mf][iü][tr] in FormActMain.PopulateRegExArr. (i used that syntax instead of (mit|für) in order to not create a new group which would result in new group/backreference counters).

Did a quick test for an old and a new log log and parses seem fine (but as i don't really know how you are parsing the files there might be other places to fix).

Frank
 
Tharabas



Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Frank_Harmann wrote:
Should be fixable by replacing "mit" with [mf][iü][tr] in FormActMain.PopulateRegExArr. (i used that syntax instead of (mit|für) in order to not create a new group which would result in new group/backreference counters).

Wouldn't (?:mit|für) work as well for not creating a backreference instead of [mf][iü][tr], which matches müt and fir as well (even though I admit that these combinations would be nonsense)?

_________________
Tharabas is the developer of all the cool features you are probably not able to see at www.exil-valor.de
/bb|[^b]{2}/
Precision is futile. You will be approximated!
 
Frank_Harmann



Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 44

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Quote:
Wouldn't (?:mit|für) work as well for not creating a backreference instead of [mf][iü][tr], which matches müt and fir as well (even though I admit that these combinations would be nonsense)?

Dunno, i never really understood regex Embarassed I just recognized that (mit|für) gave me a parsing exception and [mf][iü][tr] was the only syntax i could come up with (due to my limited kknowledge of regex)
But i am sure Aditu will know how fix it Cool
 
Aditu
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 302

 PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Hmm, if the German version of GU44 is anything like the English version of GU44, there should be a few more things to fix than just that.

On English servers they added special attacks to the log lines... such as double attacks, aoe attacks, flurry attacks. This made those lines unparsable due to the variable labels. It is likely that the change from "für" to "mit" is to accommodate "better" grammar with these special attacks embedded. Though those look like non-autoattack swings, and most of the changes happened to those.

Someone emailed me a log file that I will go through later in order to catch all of the changes. I'd be surprised if that was the only change... if it was, more will be coming soon.
 
burdy



Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 3

 PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Aditu wrote:
Hmm, if the German version of GU44 is anything like the English version of GU44, there should be a few more things to fix than just that.

On English servers they added special attacks to the log lines... such as double attacks, aoe attacks, flurry attacks. This made those lines unparsable due to the variable labels. It is likely that the change from "für" to "mit" is to accommodate "better" grammar with these special attacks embedded. Though those look like non-autoattack swings, and most of the changes happened to those.

Someone emailed me a log file that I will go through later in order to catch all of the changes. I'd be surprised if that was the only change... if it was, more will be coming soon.

I'd wish, the German log still doesn't even contain critical melee hits...
 
Aditu
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 302

 PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

@Tharabas

Your sig somewhat bothered me for a while, so I decided to look at it more closely. I don't mean the tiny text... the regular expression... is that a play on "To be or not to be..."?
 
Tharabas



Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

 PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

indeed, it is Very Happy

_________________
Tharabas is the developer of all the cool features you are probably not able to see at www.exil-valor.de
/bb|[^b]{2}/
Precision is futile. You will be approximated!
 
Safana



Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 7

 PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Misses of "Stichwaffen" (piercing) are displayed as "Aufspießen" ... results in a 100% hitrate for piercing atm (though the misses count as "Aufspießen")
 
Aditu
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 302

 PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Currently ACT switches the types from Stichwaffene and Aufspießen. I guess that the translators got rid of the trailing 'e'. Not really hard to fix as it luckily seems global.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Advanced Combat Tracker Forum Index -> Technical Support All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Community Chest